of events obeying some statistical model using Monte Carlo simulation. Brief reviews of Special Relativity and High Energy physics are also.

Enjoy!

of events obeying some statistical model using Monte Carlo simulation. Brief reviews of Special Relativity and High Energy physics are also.

Enjoy!

Software - MORE

Monte Carlo simulations in Statistical Physics. Peter Young. (Dated: May 2, ). For additional information on the statistical Physics part of this handout, the.

Enjoy!

Heermann, Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Physics,. Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences 80, Springer More condensed and advanced.

Enjoy!

Software - MORE

Heermann, Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Physics,. Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences 80, Springer More condensed and advanced.

Enjoy!

Monte Carlo method is a common name for a wide variety of stochastic Material Science, Statistical Physics, Chemical and Bio Physics, nuclear physics.

Enjoy!

of events obeying some statistical model using Monte Carlo simulation. Brief reviews of Special Relativity and High Energy physics are also.

Enjoy!

Monte Carlo method is a common name for a wide variety of stochastic Material Science, Statistical Physics, Chemical and Bio Physics, nuclear physics.

Enjoy!

Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Physics deals with the computer simulation of many-body systems in condensed-matter physics and related fields of.

Enjoy!

In experimental particle physics, Monte Carlo methods are used for designing detectors, understanding their behavior and comparing experimental data to theory.

Enjoy!

Also, we have adopted units where c is equal to one. Review of special relativity.{/INSERTKEYS}{/PARAGRAPH} Consider a single radioactive atom. The Gaussian shape is:. We can take two sets of data from the same apparatus using the same sample, fit each dataset to a nonlinear model using identical initial values for the fit parameters, and get very different final fits. It concentrates on a method of generating synthetic data sets called Monte Carlo simulation the name is after the casino. Again the final state is the same. Taylor and J. The study of sub-nuclear structure has discovered many many so-called "elementary particles. We shall call such an event pseudo-random. This is a classic seven volume work. Since you will be modifying the code in the package for the experiment, the code listing for that package is in the notebook for the experiment. Next calculate the value of the Gaussian for that value of x; it will be a number between zero and one, with the higher values indicating that x is closer to x 0. In the experiment you will use only one of them: the equidistribution test. Thus, when we are attempting to compare an experimental result to a theoretical prediction, the latter is only a probability. This situation leads to ambiguity about which fit results are "correct. All the other elementary particles, the hadrons, are believed to be made of quarks. This is the heart of the Monte Carlo technique. Simulate enough data sets and you will know the distribution of a expt — a i. Most conventional interpretations of quantum mechanics say it is random, that "God plays dice with the universe. Clever fitters, such as the ones we have used, attempt to estimate the errors in the experimental parameters, but again the statistics can conspire so that the true values are not within errors of the experimental ones. Wheeler Spacetime Physics W. A good generator will have a period that is sufficiently long that for practical purposes the numbers will never repeat. Thus, the mass of an elementary particle can be determined by measuring the energy and momenta of the decay products; since the mass is Lorentz invariant the measurement can be made in any reference frame. Generate a random number between zero and one. We will be generating some number of random events corresponding to each of these using a Monte Carlo, and combining them and comparing the generated events with the experimental data. The mass is not exactly MeV for each decay, but is spread out in a bellshaped curve. This is a common convention. This section investigates techniques to generate pseudo-random numbers using a computer. Random variations occur, as they should for all Monte Carlo simulations; these random variations also occur in real data from nuclear decays. In he proposed that we start with, say, a four digit number which we will call a seed. Calling the seed X 0 , the algorithm is:. Consider flipping an honest coin. We do a fit of a dataset to some model and get back a set of parameters a expt. Now choose a random value for x. Fortunately, you may also ignore the cross terms. Say the particle described by Equation I. Knuth 4 lists 11 empirical tests. Computers are, of course, totally deterministic unless they are broken. This document is organised as follows: I. You may recall that we stated about non-linear fits that if the data has noise, which is almost a certainty for real experimental data, then there is a difficulty. Of course:. The moment when it decays is usually considered to be a truly random event. One may start with a specific seed with:. Physics Background: needed background for the experiment. Some students have not done any special relativity in a while, and this section is intended as a review for those students. The shape of the above curve is called a Breit-Wigner or Lorentzian; you looked at this shape in the Fitting Techniques experiment. With the exception of the photon and electron and the probable exception of the proton, all of the particles are unstable, decaying into other elementary particles. We also. Floor[] rounds its argument down to an integer; Mod[] divides its first argument by the second and returns the remainder. Implementation: details of how to implement a Monte Carlo calculation. But they often are approximately random and statistical. Calculate the difference between a expt and ai. If you have not done any special relativity you should consult a textbook. In the supplementary notes for the Fitting Techniques experiment, I called this possibility a case of when the "statistics conspire. A number of different reactions can occur, and , events were collected corresponding to the final state:. Addison-Wesley, , Vol 2, Chapter 3. In a classical situation there is a set of true values for the parameters, a true , that are known only to Mother Nature. Motivation: circumstances in which Monte Carlo techniques are called for. Most generators today are variations on a linear congruential algorithm. This section discusses the situations in which physicists commonly use Monte Carlo simulations in their work. The choices for m, a and c is subtle. You will note that although the above shape is Gaussian, it is not perfect. If the value of the Gaussian is greater than the random number, keep the value of x; otherwise try again. The rest mass m 0 is also called the invariant mass because it has the same value in all reference frames; this is another way of saying that Equation I. In addition to the rather arcane theory of random number generation, people have devised a variety of methods to test the generators. Freeman, My personal favorite book on relativity. A thorough discussion of confidence limits and Monte Carlo techniques. {PARAGRAPH}{INSERTKEYS}In Experiment 1 we investigated techniques to compare theoretical predictions with experimental data. One early suggestion is due to von Neumann, one of the early giants of computer theory. For a parent particle decaying into three or more daughters, Equation I. Recall that in nuclear decays, a histogram of the energy of one of the decay products will be a Gaussian; you studied one such decay in the Fitting Techniques experiment. Of course, actual experimental errors are seldom truly random and statistical in this sense. Teukolsky, and William T. This is a huge and subtle topic, and we will only scratch the surface. Flannery, Saul A. Press, Brian P. Note that we end up with the same particles in the final state as we did in the first mechanism. The cited chapter deals with computer generated random numbers. Consider any experimental situation in which quantum mechanics forms the theoretical underpinning. All pseudo-random number generators have a non-infinite period: sooner or later the numbers in the sequences will repeat. Knuth The Art of Computer Programming, 2nd ed. Further, these estimates of errors in the values of the parameters are based on a series of sometimes dubious statistical assumptions. Thus, we view the reaction in which this meson is produced as:. In this test you check that the random numbers are in fact uniformly distributed between the minimum and maximum values. If we know the rest mass of a decay product, we can then use Equation I. In the experiment that you will be studying, we have a stationary liquid Hydrogen target; this target can be considered as a collection of stationary protons. Then, we can use Equation I. The invariant mass of the parent particle is then given by:. This means that the comparison between theory and experiment is quite different from the sorts of comparison that we looked at in Experiment 1 - Fitting Techniques. So the pseudo-random number is Square this and take the middle four digits to generate the next pseudo-random number:. Imagine that we want to generate a number of events whose histogram will be Gaussian. Given the data and its experimental errors, we can use a Monte Carlo technique to generate a synthetic data set, say data i. We can fit the synthetic data to the same model we used with the real data to get a set of parameters a i. Note that we have written the left hand side of Equation III. So the next pseudo-random number is The following code duplicates the above calculations in a more elegant fashion:.